-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Schaad [mailto:jimsch(_at_)nwlink(_dot_)com]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 1:29 PM
To: 'Blake Ramsdell'
Cc: Ietf-Smime
Subject: Comments on draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-05.txt
1. Section 2.2.1: In the following text, I have a problem
with "PKIX" as
oppose to X.509 Identity Certificates, esp as PKIX now has a
definition for
ACs.
Switched to PKIX.
2. Section 2.2.1, p 3: s/suerceded/superseded/ --- I didn't
believe it but
I looked it up.
Fixed.
3. Section 2.3: The following statements don't agree:
Receiving agents MUST be able to handle an arbitrary number of
certificates of arbitrary relationship to the message sender and to
each other in arbitrary order.
A receiving agent
SHOULD be able to handle an arbitrarily large number of certificates
and chains.
Switched to MUST.
5. Section 3: Please define the type of field for
pkcs-9-at-emailAddress.
(I think it's IA5 string but can't swear to it off the top of
my head.)
It is indeed IA5String. Added:
Note that this attribute MUST be encoded as IA5String.
6. Section 5: s/noticable/noticeable/
Fixed.
7. Section 5: s/message,if/message, if/
Fixed.
Blake