ietf-smime
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-smime] Consistence question of CMS

2008-11-05 12:26:44

At Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:21:25 -0500 , Russ Housley wrote:

I think this is an error.
I think the end of the RFC 3852 algorithm should be:

             IF (originatorInfo is absent) AND
                (unprotectedAttrs is absent) AND
                (all RecipientInfo structures are version 0)
             THEN version is 0
             ELSE version is 2

Do others agree?

Russ

Yes.  I agree.

But that's by far an easy job, more of re-inventing the wheel:

Looking up my printed copy of RFC 3852, I found a bold question
mark on page 18, vis-a-vis of that algorithm, and an exclamation
mark pointing out the diff from 3369.

Sigh -- admittedly I had to recognize that apparently I never
had found the time to report errata for that RFC ...   :-)

But *you* did, Russ!  ( on 2005-01-22 )


Folks, please look up the result of Russ' error report at:
  <http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3852&eid=222>


Kind regards,
  Alfred Hönes.

-- 

+------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
| TR-Sys Alfred Hoenes   |  Alfred Hoenes   Dipl.-Math., Dipl.-Phys.  |
| Gerlinger Strasse 12   |  Phone: (+49)7156/9635-0, Fax: -18         |
| D-71254  Ditzingen     |  E-Mail:  ah(_at_)TR-Sys(_dot_)de                    
 |
+------------------------+--------------------------------------------+

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [ietf-smime] Consistence question of CMS, Alfred Hönes <=