ietf-smime
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-3851bis (Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) Version 3.2 Message Specification) to Proposed Standard

2008-11-13 16:23:01

At 4:00 PM -0500 11/13/08, Russ Housley wrote:
Wouldn't it be much simpler to say that the key wrap algorithm must be the 
same as the content encryption algorithm? Yes, one *might* want a keywrap of 
greater strength as you have above, but that forces implementations to have 
tables of what "greater" means. Saying they need to be the same is much more 
straight forward.

The keysize could be the same, but the mode will probably be different.  One 
would not want to use AES Key Wrap for the content.

Sorry, of course. I meant "same underlying encryption function", not "same 
algorithm".