[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-smime-3850bis-09.txt]

2009-04-23 16:21:07

I did receive some comments on this draft at the last second:

- SHOULD- on 1024-bit DSA key ought to be SHOULD
- RSA-PSS should be replaced with RSASSA-PSS
- RSASA-PSS in references should be RSASSA-PSS

I think the 1st one is a good suggestion because SHOULD- on a key size doesn't seem to make much sense to me especially in the light of DSA with SHA-256 being a SHOULD+.

The last two are editorial.

Unless there's strong objections to adopting these changes, I'll post a new version of this ID Friday afternoon for Tim to continue processing.


Sean Turner wrote:

To date, I have received no comments on this version of the ID.


Sean Turner wrote:
This ID incorporates comments necessary to resolve IESG DISCUSSES and incorporates key size text from our Area Director. The changes were in some cases significant and as a result I'm asking for a one week comment period that will end 22 April 2009 @ 8am EST.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>