Folks,
This may be too late (we are not sure whether the comment was sent in
earlier or not), or may already have been dealt with.
However, a colleague has checked the ASN.1 and reports:
"I have reviewed draft-ietf-smime-new-asn1-05.txt and also
draft-ietf-pkix-new-asn1-05.txt
because the smime IMPORTS from that. Everything seems to be OK. I have only one
comment about
draft-ietf-pkix-new-asn1-05.txt: in three places in OID values "member-body" is
misspelled
as "memberBody".
Jean-Paul."
John L
Sean Turner wrote:
The SMIME WG did not meet in Stockholm.
We have 8 IDs. Since the last meeting, 5 IDs have entered the RFC
editor's queue raising the number of SMIME WG IDs with the RFC editor
to 7:
- draft-ietf-smime-multisig
- draft-ietf-smime-sha2
- draft-ietf-smime-3850bis
- draft-ietf-smime-3850bis
- draft-ietf-smime-3278bis
- draft-ietf-smime-new-asn1
- draft-ietf-smime-3852bis
All of the documents are pinned on documents from PKIX, the TLP
revisions, or both.
A new version of draft-ietf-smime-rsa-kem was posted to address
comments made by Steve Kent during his SECDIR review. We issued a 2nd
WGLC because the revisions were pretty substantial. One set of
comments, which I would categorize as minor, was received during the
2nd WGLC. A new version will be posted, and then the document will
passed to Tim Polk.
Once all the documents have been published we will initiate the
procedure to shut down the WG.
spt
--
Prof John Larmouth
Larmouth T&PDS Ltd
(Training and Protocol Design Services Ltd)
1 Blueberry Road
Bowdon j(_dot_)larmouth(_at_)btinternet(_dot_)com
Altrincham
Cheshire
WA14 3LS
England
Tel: +44 161 928 1605