Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5752 (2028)

The proposed correction is appropriate, and does not result in a 
technical change to the RFC. I have no objection to this errata.
spt

RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5752,
> "Multiple Signatures in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5752&eid=2028
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah(_at_)TR-Sys(_dot_)de>
>
> Section: 2.1, pg. 6
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>    The following is an example:
>
>       SignedData
>         DigestAlg=sha1,sha256
>         SignerInfo1                SignerInfo2
>           digestAlg=sha1             digestAlg=sha256
>           signatureAlg=dsawithsha1   signatureAlg=ecdsawithsha256
>           signedAttrs=               signedAttrs=
>             signingTime1               signingTime1
>             messageDigest1             messageDigest2
>             multiSig1=                 multiSig2=
>               bodyHash=sha256           bodyHash=sha1
>               signAlg=ecdsawithsha256   signAlg=dsawithsha1
>  |              signAttrsHash=          signAttrsHash=
>  |              algID=sha1              algID=sha256
>  |              hash=value1             hash=value2
>
>
>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    The following is an example:
>
>       SignedData
>         DigestAlg=sha1,sha256
>         SignerInfo1                SignerInfo2
>           digestAlg=sha1             digestAlg=sha256
>           signatureAlg=dsawithsha1   signatureAlg=ecdsawithsha256
>           signedAttrs=               signedAttrs=
>             signingTime1               signingTime1
>             messageDigest1             messageDigest2
>             multiSig1=                 multiSig2=
>               bodyHash=sha256           bodyHash=sha1
>               signAlg=ecdsawithsha256   signAlg=dsawithsha1
>  |            signAttrsHash=            signAttrsHash=
>  |              algID=sha1                algID=sha256
>  |              hash=value1               hash=value2
>
>
>
>
> Notes
> -----
> Rationale:
>   Fixed indentation for consistency and clarity
>   (visual indication of subordinate elements).
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5752 (draft-ietf-smime-multisig-05)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Multiple Signatures in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
> Publication Date    : January 2010
> Author(s)           : S. Turner, J. Schaad
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : S/MIME Mail Security
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
_______________________________________________
smime mailing list
smime(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime