Re: [smime] SignatureType Attribute OID2013-10-18 10:11:57You may be correct, but the OID for this attribute was assigned. We know the authors did some implementation, so it would be nice to hear what was actually done. Russ On Oct 18, 2013, at 11:03 AM, Jim Schaad wrote: I made the assumption that the attribute is actually identified by id-sti instead of id-aa-signtureType. It was done the other way in a draft document. I guess we would need to query the authors if it is wrong. Jim-----Original Message----- From: Russ Housley [mailto:housley(_at_)vigilsec(_dot_)com] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 7:03 AM To: Jim Schaad Cc: 'IETF SMIME' Subject: Re: [smime] SignatureType Attribute OID I'm not sure. RFC 3183 says: An S/MIME signed attribute is used to indicate the type of signature. This should be used in conjunction with the naming conventions specified in the previous section. When an S/MIME signed message containing the signature type attribute is received it triggers the software to verify that the correct naming convention has been used. The ASN.1 [4] notation of this attribute is: - SignatureType ::= SEQUENCE OF OBJECT IDENTIFIER It seems to me that the specification fails to also say that the signaturetypeattribute is identified byid-aa-signatureType OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-aa 28 }Russ On Oct 17, 2013, at 6:15 PM, Jim Schaad wrote:Mistype - RFC 3183 seems to be where it started from - but is now using adifferentmarker. However, it seems to have been overloaded in a strange way. I think this may be a fault in the way the RFC progressed. Jim-----Original Message----- From: smime-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org [mailto:smime-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Russ Housley Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 2:54 PM To: IETF SMIME Subject: [smime] SignatureType Attribute OID The S/MIME arc contains an assignment for this OID. id-smime OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs9(9) 16 } id-aa OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-smime 2 } -- attributes id-aa-signatureType OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-aa 28 } I cannot find an RFC that makes use of this OID. Does anyone knowwhereitit used? It seems to be related to the Domain Security stuff in RFC3183,butit is not used in that document. If no one can point me to a place where this OID is used, I will markit"reserved and obsolete". Russ
smime.p7s _______________________________________________ smime mailing list smime(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime
|
|