Normally one would presume that the trust point is shared and thus can be
excluded from the path. I do not believe that a problem would exist if a
reference to the trust point existed, as long as that did not constitute a
trust decision.
Jim
From: smime [mailto:smime-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Hajek, Juraj
Sent: Friday, November 3, 2017 3:10 AM
To: smime(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [smime] RFC3125: Question - CertInfoReq fullPath
Hello,
we are not sure about the interpretation of the following sentence in
RFC3125 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3125/?include_text=1).
CertRefReq and CertInfoReq, p.9
?References for full cert path up to a trust point required?
Does it mean that the trust point should be included or excluded in the
path?
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Juraj Hájek
Project Manager
Ardaco, a.s.
_______________________________________________
smime mailing list
smime(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime