[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [smime] RFC3125: Question - CertInfoReq fullPath

2017-11-03 13:08:32
Normally one would presume that the trust point is shared and thus can be
excluded from the path.  I do not believe that a problem would exist if a
reference to the trust point existed, as long as that did not constitute a
trust decision.





From: smime [mailto:smime-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Hajek, Juraj
Sent: Friday, November 3, 2017 3:10 AM
To: smime(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [smime] RFC3125: Question - CertInfoReq fullPath




we are not sure about the interpretation of the following sentence in
RFC3125 (


CertRefReq and CertInfoReq, p.9

?References for full cert path up to a trust point required?


Does it mean that  the trust point should be included or excluded in the


Thank you very much.


Best regards,


Juraj Hájek

Project Manager


Ardaco, a.s.


smime mailing list
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>