On Mar 19, 2018, at 10:52, RFC Errata System
<rfc-editor(_at_)rfc-editor(_dot_)org> wrote:
Any objections to adding a note in draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5751-bis along the
same lines as the note for receipentKeyId?
It’s slightly different than renaming receipentKeyId because this is an OID so
you could also do this:
id-aa-encryptKeyPref OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= id-aa-encrypKeyPref
But I also don’t have an issue with just adding the note.
spt
_______________________________________________
smime mailing list
smime(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime