I got a message from ftpmail(_at_)gamers(_dot_)org just now, saying that "my
request" was syntactically invalid. Here's the headers of "my
request".
From agulbra(_at_)nvg(_dot_)unit(_dot_)no Sun Sep 6 19:26:11 1998
Received: from www16.web2010.com (www16.web2010.com [209.25.53.1])
by thegate.gamers.org (8.8.5/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA09059
for <ftpmail(_at_)gamers(_dot_)org>; Sun, 6 Sep 1998 19:26:10 -0400
From: agulbra(_at_)nvg(_dot_)unit(_dot_)no
Received: from pavilion.pavilion.net (dialup-04.intecnet.net [207.0.31.195])
by www16.web2010.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA19283; Sun, 6 Sep 1998
19:25:18 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1998 19:25:18 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199809062325(_dot_)TAA19283(_at_)www16(_dot_)web2010(_dot_)com>
To: Customer(_at_)Yourplace(_dot_)com
Subject: YOUR CLASSIFIED - AD / 333 NEWSPAPERS !!!!
Do spammers do this all the time - using other people's real, valid
addresses?
Has there been any progress on SMTP authentication drafts? Last I saw
was a kind of nice server-/gateway-based thing by Donald Eastman. Is
it (or anything else) moving towards production use?
--Arnt