ietf-smtp
[
Top
]
[
All Lists
]
<prev
[
Date
]
next>
[
Advanced
]
<prev
[
Thread
]
next>
Re: ambiguities in RFC 2821 regarding end of mail data
2003-06-20 15:10:33
from [
Richard O. Hammer
]
[
Permanent Link
]
If Vladis and Keith are right (that the entire CRLF.CRLF should be
dropped), then the final "line" of data would typically have no CRLF.
It would consist of a set of bytes ending without a CRLF.
Do you think that is right? Rich
[
More with this subject...
]
<Prev in Thread
]
Current Thread
[
Next in Thread>
Re: BDAT, RFC 3030 protocol clarification?
,
(continued)
Re: BDAT, RFC 3030 protocol clarification?
,
Keith Moore
Re: BDAT, RFC 3030 protocol clarification?
,
Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: BDAT, RFC 3030 protocol clarification?
,
ned+ietf-smtp
Re: BDAT, RFC 3030 protocol clarification?
,
Keith Moore
RE: BDAT, RFC 3030 protocol clarification?
,
Vaudreuil, Greg M (Greg)
Re: BDAT, RFC 3030 protocol clarification?
,
Matti Aarnio
ambiguities in RFC 2821 regarding end of mail data
,
Richard O. Hammer
Re: ambiguities in RFC 2821 regarding end of mail data
,
Keith Moore
Re: ambiguities in RFC 2821 regarding end of mail data
,
Richard O. Hammer
Re: ambiguities in RFC 2821 regarding end of mail data
,
Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: ambiguities in RFC 2821 regarding end of mail data
,
Richard O. Hammer
<=
Re: ambiguities in RFC 2821 regarding end of mail data
,
D. J. Bernstein
Re: ambiguities in RFC 2821 regarding end of mail data
,
Keith Moore
Re: ambiguities in RFC 2821 regarding end of mail data
,
Richard O. Hammer
Previous by Date:
Re: ambiguities in RFC 2821 regarding end of mail data
,
Valdis . Kletnieks
Next by Date:
Re: ambiguities in RFC 2821 regarding end of mail data
,
Richard O. Hammer
Previous by Thread:
Re: ambiguities in RFC 2821 regarding end of mail data
,
Valdis . Kletnieks
Next by Thread:
Re: ambiguities in RFC 2821 regarding end of mail data
,
D. J. Bernstein
Indexes:
[
Date
] [
Thread
] [
Top
] [
All Lists
]