Alexey Melnikov wrote:
The draft is referencing <mailbox> from RFC 2821, not from
RFC 2822!
That will do the trick. It's a <Mailbox> there, checking, yes,
rule names are case insensitive. In 2368 it's a 2822-<mailbox>.
Maybe copy what you need from the Wikipedia article.
Are you talking about CRAM-MD5/DIGEST-MD5 or ESMTPA? I was
talking about the latter here.
Me too. I've never seen anything ESMTPA that's not CRAM-MD5
so far, but I also didn't try hard to find it.
I don't think CRAM-MD5 is a starter due to security concerns.
The only security difference I'm aware of is the <cnonce> if
DIGEST-MD5 is used for authentication. If you know some
interoperable DIGEST-MD5 combo of MSA and MUA maybe submit
to the interop list, fresh ammo for the last call flamewar.
If you need a working DIGEST-MD5 example you can grab it from
NNTPAUTH (test:test). What's the example password for rjs3 ?
I'm collecting most working MD5 examples published in RFCs :-)
Frank