ietf-smtp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Updated status on 2821bis 4/24

2007-05-03 12:07:25

There has been no additional discussion on issues 3, 16, 17, 26, 27 and
28 since 2821bis-03 came out. These issues are now considered resolved
and closed.

Thank you everyone for your help.

        Tony Hansen
        tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com

Tony Hansen wrote:
This is a recap of where we stand on issues that I consider to be closed
with respect to 2821bis-02. 
...
Text has been changed in -03 for the following issues:

3     EHLO validation in sect 4.1.4, para 6
16    General use of "is permitted", etc
17    Should text be clarified to single code in continuations
      and dealing with 1yz
26    Revise description of reverse-paths to prevent repeated
      citations of "server adds its own…"
27    Straighten out and define terminology for talking about headers
28    Client behavior with unrecognized code

Unless there's a problem with the updated text in -03, these issues will
be considered closed.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Updated status on 2821bis 4/24, Tony Hansen <=