There has been no additional discussion on issues 3, 16, 17, 26, 27 and
28 since 2821bis-03 came out. These issues are now considered resolved
and closed.
Thank you everyone for your help.
Tony Hansen
tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com
Tony Hansen wrote:
This is a recap of where we stand on issues that I consider to be closed
with respect to 2821bis-02.
...
Text has been changed in -03 for the following issues:
3 EHLO validation in sect 4.1.4, para 6
16 General use of "is permitted", etc
17 Should text be clarified to single code in continuations
and dealing with 1yz
26 Revise description of reverse-paths to prevent repeated
citations of "server adds its own…"
27 Straighten out and define terminology for talking about headers
28 Client behavior with unrecognized code
Unless there's a problem with the updated text in -03, these issues will
be considered closed.