Re: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-hansen-4468upd-mailesc-registry-02.txt]

Alexey Melnikov writes:
> Chris Newman wrote:
> [...]
>
> > This approach does not alter:
> > <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis-09.txt>
> > which is in the RFC editor queue.
> BTW, this is RFC 4954 now.
It is? Then I repeat my prediction: SASL-IR will be RFC 5000.

Arnt