[ietf-smtp] Moving RFC4406 to historic?

ietf-smtp

[ietf-smtp] Moving RFC4406 to historic?

2018-03-22 09:49:36

I just noticed (when reviewing the latest 7601bis version) that Sender-ID
was never officially deprecated, i.e., moved to "historic" status. That
probably should have been done as part of the SPFbis work.

For the sake of people browsing the IETF RFCs, what would it take to make
4406 historic?

--Kurt

_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ietf-smtp] Moving RFC4406 to historic?, Kurt Andersen (b) <= Re: [ietf-smtp] Moving RFC4406 to historic?, Dave Crocker Re: [ietf-smtp] Moving RFC4406 to historic?, Ned Freed Re: [ietf-smtp] Moving RFC4406 to historic?, Kurt Andersen (b) Re: [ietf-smtp] Moving RFC4406 to historic?, John R. Levine Re: [ietf-smtp] Moving RFC4406 to historic?, Alexey Melnikov Re: [ietf-smtp] Moving RFC4406 to historic?, Murray S. Kucherawy Re: [ietf-smtp] [dmarc-ietf] Moving RFC4406 to historic?, Rolf E. Sonneveld Re: [ietf-smtp] Moving RFC4406 to historic?, Barry Leiba Re: [ietf-smtp] [dmarc-ietf] Moving RFC4406 to historic?, Rolf E. Sonneveld Re: [ietf-smtp] Moving RFC4406 to historic?, Ned Freed

Next by Date:	Re: [ietf-smtp] Moving RFC4406 to historic?, Dave Crocker
Next by Thread:	Re: [ietf-smtp] Moving RFC4406 to historic?, Dave Crocker
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]