ietf-smtp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-smtp] FWD: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5321 (5414)

2018-06-30 14:39:14
In article 
<d9590MBaSMXeDeyKBiep95vNNWUR/rXvfjm4aVi2Q1g=.sha-256@antelope.email> you write:
I seem to remember that someone actually uses this... for double 
bounces? From: ""@[] or an address target like that.

Qmail, perhaps, 

Qmail uses addresses like that internally but they are not supposed to
go out on the wire.

The erratum looks right to me, but it is a little disconcerting that
it took 18 years for anyone to notice.  The 5321 text is the same as
in 2821.

R's,
John

_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp