Re: [ietf-smtp] smtp extension model

ietf-smtp

Re: [ietf-smtp] smtp extension model

2019-02-01 05:26:22

On Thu 31/Jan/2019 04:46:02 +0100 John C Klensin wrote:


I think those kinds of questions are going to require a WG
rather than, e.g., Pete and I getting together and putting
drafts together with while everyone will be comfortable.  YMMD
but be careful what you wish for or wish the ADs to wish for.


+1, it would be about time!


Best
Ale
-- 



_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [ietf-smtp] smtp extension model, Alessandro Vesely <= Re: [ietf-smtp] smtp extension model, John C Klensin Re: [ietf-smtp] smtp extension model, Bron Gondwana Re: [ietf-smtp] smtp extension model, Alessandro Vesely Re: [ietf-smtp] smtp extension model, Hector Santos

Previous by Date:	Re: [ietf-smtp] DKIM andsmtp extension model (was: Re: [Proposal] confusing parts of the mail system, was 250-MARKDOWN), Ned Freed
Next by Date:	Re: [ietf-smtp] DKIM andsmtp extension model (was: Re: [Proposal] confusing parts of the mail system, was 250-MARKDOWN), Arnt Gulbrandsen
Previous by Thread:	Re: [ietf-smtp] DKIM andsmtp extension model (was: Re: [Proposal] confusing parts of the mail system, was 250-MARKDOWN), Ned Freed
Next by Thread:	Re: [ietf-smtp] smtp extension model, John C Klensin
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]