Re: [ietf-smtp] Email standard revision, was address maximum length

On 12/2/2019 10:55 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> The deeper issue is that SMTP is rife with layer violations
drat. not worded carefully enough.  sorry.


I meant:

     The deeper issue is that RFC 821 was rife with layer violations 
and that this has never been fixed.

d/

--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp