James Clark wrote:
Do you intend to introduce XSLT-specific fragment identifiers in the
future?
I don't know of any plans to do this.
Or, do you intend to use XPointer for referencing into XSLT?
That's what I would expect.
Then, I would suggest application/xsl-xml (other than application/xml).
Since XSL stylesheets are not readable for casual readers, text/* is not
appropriate (see the criteria explained by Ned Freed [1]). It might be a
good idea to follow the "*/*-xml" contention, since you do not want to lose
the support of generic XML processing such as XPointer.
I think that text/xml is not appropriate for XSLT since an XSLT stylesheet
is not readable by casual users.
[1] http://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-mime/mail-archive/msg00203.html
Makoto
Fuji Xerox Information Systems
Tel: +81-44-812-7230 Fax: +81-44-812-7231
E-mail: murata(_dot_)makoto(_at_)fujixerox(_dot_)co(_dot_)jp