Simon St. Laurent and I co-authored an I-D for XML media types. It
is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-murata-xml-01.txt
On the basis of discussion in this ML (most notably Ned's comments),
this version shows when text/xml is more appropriate than application/xml
and vice versa. Non-XPointer fragment identifiers for XML vocabularies
like SVG and SMIL requires further discussion.
Incidentally, the XSLT recommendation is published from W3C today. It is
available at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt
Although we have agreed that fragments do not have media types, "2.7 Embedding
Stylesheets" of this recommendation uses "text/xml" for fragments. Since
another
recommendation of W3C, namely "Associating stylesheets with XML documents",
already mandates the pseudo attribute "type" for stylesheet-linking PIs,
XSLT had to specify something. Comments?
Cheers,
Makoto
Fuji Xerox Information Systems
Tel: +81-44-812-7230 Fax: +81-44-812-7231
E-mail: murata(_dot_)makoto(_at_)fujixerox(_dot_)co(_dot_)jp