I'd be a little stronger -- too late, too bad, write another draft.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-roamops(_at_)tdmx(_dot_)rutgers(_dot_)edu
[mailto:owner-roamops(_at_)tdmx(_dot_)rutgers(_dot_)edu]On Behalf Of
pcalhoun(_at_)eng(_dot_)sun(_dot_)com
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 7:04 AM
To: Dan Kohn
Cc: roamops(_at_)tdmx(_dot_)rutgers(_dot_)edu;
ietf-xml-mime(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-roamops-phonebook-xml-05.txt
Dan,
Given that this particular document has already been through WG,
IESG *and*
IETF last call, how strongly do you feel about this proposed appendix?
PatC
I would recommend adding an appendix to
<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-roamops-phonebook-
xml-05.txt
where you register a MIME type for a roamops phonebook based
on the advice
provided in
<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-murata-xml-08.txt>.
It would appear that application/phonebook+xml may be a good choice.
- dan
--
Dan Kohn <mailto:dan(_at_)dankohn(_dot_)com>
<http://www.dankohn.com> <tel:+1-650-327-2600>