I agree with Martin entirely, but I would like to stress the
importance of the "+xml" convention.
Reasons for the "/xml+rpc" subtype:
- despite [3023] paragraph 1 and section 7, I believe it was ok to not
use the "+xml" postfix this time, because the term "XML-RPC" is the
protocol name and "/xml+rpc" would sound only little different
(wouldn't this allow for an exception from the rule?)
The whole point of using the "+xml" convention is allow generic XML
programs (e.g., parsers, browsers, etc.) to work properly. I am sure
that many programs work with XML-RPC messages. For example, users
might want to use browsers for debugging XML-RPC. Unless there are
good reasons to *forbid* generic XML programs, please follow the
"+xml" convention.
Cheers,
--
MURATA Makoto <murata(_at_)hokkaido(_dot_)email(_dot_)ne(_dot_)jp>