* Phil Archer wrote:
To whom it may concern,
This request was submitted on 8th December last year, archived at [1],
and effectively replaced the requests sent previously that were
incorrect for various reasons [2].
As the POWDER WG makes its final preparations for a transition request
for W3C Proposed Recommendation status, I realise that there has been no
acknowledgement of the corrected requests, still less a resolution.
Ultimately your request has to go to the IESG; the ietf-types list is
only for community review of proposed registrations, and IANA will only
register types in the standards tree as directed by the IESG. I believe
the W3C prefers if registration requests to the IESG are made through
W3C's IETF liaison (Dan Connolly and Philippe Le Hégaret).
--
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern(_at_)hoehrmann(_dot_)de ·
http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/