Dear Kazuyuki,
would you think as conceivable to put EmotionML into a clipboard?
If yes it would be nice to include in this specification:
- a Windows clipboard name (more or less, just a string) which applications
would register at start
- a Macintosh Uniform Type Identifier (which application descriptors could
register)
thanks in advance
Paul
Le 10 mai 2012 à 19:12, Kazuyuki Ashimura a écrit :
Dear list,
# sorry but resending because I used wrong address for my previous post.
W3C has just published a Candidate Recommendation for "Emotion Markup
Language (EmotionML)" at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-emotionml-20120510/
I am sending this request to ask the Ietf-types list for comments on
the Media Type section of the EmotionML specification following the
procedure defined at:
http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype
---
The Media Type section of the EmotionML specification is available
at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-emotionml-20120510/#MIME-type
and a plain text copy is also available below.
MIME media type name:
---------------------
application
MIME subtype name:
------------------
emotionml+xml
Required parameters:
--------------------
None.
Optional parameters:
--------------------
charset
This parameter has identical semantics to the charset parameter of the
application/xml media type as specified in [RFC3023] or its successor.
Encoding considerations:
------------------------
By virtue of EmotionML content being XML, it has the same considerations
when sent as "application/emotionml+xml" as does XML. See RFC 3023 (or its
successor), section 3.2.
Security considerations:
------------------------
EmotionML elements may include arbitrary URIs. Therefore the security
issues of [RFC3986], section 7, should be considered.
In addition, because of the extensibility features for EmotionML, it is
possible that "application/emotionml+xml" will describe content that has
security implications beyond those described here. However, if the processor
follows only the normative semantics of this specification, this content will
be ignored. Only in the case where the processor recognizes and processes the
additional content, or where further processing of that content is dispatched
to other processors, would security issues potentially arise. And in that
case, they would fall outside the domain of this registration document.
Interoperability considerations:
--------------------------------
This specification describes processing semantics that dictate the
required behavior for dealing with, among other things, unrecognized elements.
Because EmotionML is extensible, conformant "application/emotionml+xml"
processors MAY expect that content received is well-formed XML, but
processors SHOULD NOT assume that the content is valid EmotionML or expect to
recognize all of the elements and attributes in the document.
Published specification:
------------------------
This media type registration is extracted from Appendix B of the "Emotion
Markup Language (EmotionML) 1.0" specification.
Additional information:
-----------------------
Magic number(s):
There is no single initial octet sequence that is always present in
EmotionML documents.
File extension(s):
EmotionML documents are most often identified with the extensions
".emotionml".
Macintosh File Type Code(s):
TEXT
Person & email address to contact for further information:
----------------------------------------------------------
Kazuyuki Ashimura, <ashimura(_at_)w3(_dot_)org>.
Intended usage:
---------------
COMMON
Author/Change controller:
-------------------------
The EmotionML specification is a work product of the World Wide Web
Consortium's Multimodal Interaction Working Group. The W3C has change control
over these specifications.
----------------------
Normative References:
----------------------
RFC 3023
XML Media Types, M. Murata et al., Editors. IETF RFC 3023, January 2001.
Sincerely,
Kazuyuki
--
Kaz Ashimura, W3C Staff Contact for Web&TV, MMI and Voice
Tel: +81 466 49 1170