RE: Intended category of I-Ds

At 11:41 AM 2/9/00 -0800, Cameron Young wrote:
> I've come a cross a number of WG I-Ds which did not indicate
> their intended category AND the WG I-D didn't provide appropriate
> clarification.  (Yes, I've brought this to the attention of
> the WG chairs and I-D authors).
I meant:

I've come a cross a number of WG I-Ds which did not indicate
their intended category AND the WG CHARTER didn't provide
appropriate clarification.