Hi
Actually IMHO, it would not be such a jump for them to make. They
impose trademark restrictions on DNS entries and the URDP has been
used to capture some generic wording. As the by--aduwvya actually
translates to a similar wording I don't see it holding up the courts
or the URDP for long.
Dassa
|>-----Original Message-----
|>From: Stephen Dyer [mailto:steve(_at_)uk(_dot_)com]
|>Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 9:14 PM
|>To: vint cerf; Richard Shockey; Dan Kolis; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
|>Subject: Re: Example of dns (non) fun
|>
|>
|>Hi,
|>
|>There is also an interesting legal problem lurking with
|>http://www.deja.fr/ and http://www.bq--aduwvya.fr/
|>
|>A court might find me guilty of trademark violation of "deja"
|>with the
|>first URL, but I can't see them upholding the same for "bq--aduwvya"