Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, etc.
2001-01-14 10:20:02
In message <1084(_dot_)979476468(_at_)cs(_dot_)ucl(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk>, Jon
Crowcroft writes:
the bggest problems with security ssytems are generally 90% to do with
design errors at level 10 (human, not policitcal, economic,
application, transport etc)
Mostly right, though one shouldn't rule out the possibility of layer
10-inspired insider tampering with the software. Nor should one ignore
the possiblity of simple bugs -- the electronic equivalent of hanging
chad. See http://www.notablesoftware.com/evote.html for more details.
But the hard parts of the electronic voting problem have nothing to do
with crypto, firewalls, protocols, DDoS attacks and the like -- and I
say that as an expert in those fields.
--Steve Bellovin, http:/www.research.att.com/~smb
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, etc., (continued)
- Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, etc., Stephen Sprunk
- Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, etc., Ed Gerck
- Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, etc., Ed Gerck
- Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, etc., Kai Henningsen
Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, etc.,
Steven M. Bellovin <=
Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, etc., Steven M. Bellovin
Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, etc., Vernon Schryver
Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, etc., Vernon Schryver
Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, etc., Steven M. Bellovin
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, etc., Jon Crowcroft |
Next by Date: |
Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, etc., Ed Gerck |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, etc., Ed Gerck |
Next by Thread: |
Re: internet voting -- ICANN, SmartInitiatives, etc., Ed Gerck |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|