Can we please agree that there is no perfect place to hold the IETF and
stop this discussion?
Henk
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Marc Blanchet wrote:
At/À 11:14 2001-03-20 -0500, John Day you wrote/vous écriviez:
The electronic outdoor temperature sign in the skyway reading
"39". The units aren't mentioned. Kelvins?
Wow!!! It must be Spring in Minneapolis. I hadn't realized it would be so
warm. Nice that it worked out that way.
The stockbroker's electronic sign showing the Dow trying to break
10,000.
I understand the reasoning for holding the IETF here -- to discourage
all but the most highly motivated from attending. But it doesn't seem
to be working. So why, oh why, can't we just permanently move this
thing to (say) Las Vegas, where there are hotels actually large enough
to accomodate us, and where the winter climate is actually survivable?
Even with Spring in MN, this is probably still a good idea. Or New
Orleans, at least it is warm and centrally located.
sorry, but this is a US centric comment. IETF is international, so
centrally located is an interesting question: center of the earth (probably
enough hot...;-))).
back on work...
Marc.
Take care,
Marc Blanchet
Viagénie inc.
tel: 418-656-9254
http://www.viagenie.qc.ca
----------------------------------------------------------
Normos (http://www.normos.org): Internet standards portal:
IETF RFC, drafts, IANA, W3C, ATMForum, ISO, ... all in one place.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henk Uijterwaal Email:
henk(_dot_)uijterwaal(_at_)ripe(_dot_)net
RIPE Network Coordination Centre WWW: http://www.ripe.net/home/henk
Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.5354414
1016 AB Amsterdam Fax: +31.20.5354445
The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As long as you don't tell your friends how I played the hand,
then I won't tell my friends how you defended it. (Anonymous)