ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Carrier Class Gateway

2001-04-27 06:30:04
only 16" guns? why the dreadnoughts and battlecruisers of her majestys royal
navy had 18" guns.

Of course there at the bottom of the northsea near jutland with the other
half of the grand fleet and German navy but lets not split hairs..........

Rob Butlin,
Senior Network Engineer
Data Network Engineering
One 2 One
Office 44 (0)208 214 2218
Mobile 44 (0)795 738 2510
Fax 44 (0)709 208 8512
rob(_dot_)butlin(_at_)one2one(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk





-----Original Message-----
From: Willis, Scott L [mailto:scott(_dot_)willis(_at_)qwest(_dot_)com]
Sent: 25 April 2001 10:44 PM
To: 'Pat Holden'; Jose Manuel Arronte Garcia; 
Mark(_dot_)Abinante(_at_)HSC(_dot_)COM;
Lloyd Wood
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: Carrier Class Gateway


Why Waste time with calculations, It's an American Ship!  Swing the 16" guns
and blow the Bridge. Bush can call it routine and not apologize for it.

-----Original Message-----
From: Pat Holden [mailto:pat(_dot_)holden(_at_)SERANOA(_dot_)COM]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 5:13 PM
To: Jose Manuel Arronte Garcia; Mark(_dot_)Abinante(_at_)HSC(_dot_)COM; Lloyd 
Wood
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: Carrier Class Gateway


one would have to consider high tides during a full moon to get an accurate
measurement.

I am also sorry about this but...

I think all the calculation regarding height limit should be made based on
high tides; it is easier to know if a ship would be able to pass on high
tide or not, when its the "sentsitive" time to let it pass, with it is
higher tides...

Manuel Arronte.



----- Original Message -----
From: <Mark(_dot_)Abinante(_at_)HSC(_dot_)COM>
To: "Lloyd Wood" <L(_dot_)Wood(_at_)eim(_dot_)surrey(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk>
Cc: <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 1:44 P
Subject: RE: Carrier Class Gateway



There's some discussion of Panama requirements in 'The New New
Thing'.
Not just a lock, but there's a bridge to worry about; passing
under
it
at low tide is your height limit.

i would imagine the problem would be at high, not low, tide.

oops. mea culpa.

L.


Sorry to add yet another post to a pointless thread but...
Lloyd was right the first time.  Height limit would be based on low
tide.
For ships that are near the height limit, waiting a mean time of 6 hours
for the next low tide is not a big deal.
-Mark



NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER:
This email (including attachments) is confidential.  If you have received
this email in error please notify the sender immediately and delete this
email from your system without copying or disseminating it or placing any
reliance upon its contents.  We cannot accept liability for any breaches of
confidence arising through use of email.  Any opinions expressed in this
email (including attachments) are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect our opinions.  We will not accept responsibility for any commitments
made by our employees outside the scope of our business.  We do not warrant
the accuracy or completeness of such information.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>