Hello:
First of all, thank you for reply. And by the way,
you do not need to send me an extra copy of your
email (since I am on the IETF list).
Second, I get more annoyed when receive:
- extra copies of a same email
- "I am out of office" messages (guess: how many will I
receive soon...).
- be rich in 7 days adv.
- Goldstein's tonner supply adv;
compared to a single predictable (filterable) "monthly
report" posting.
Third, but it should not be considered as supporting
that monthly report post. I was questioning the
reason for stopping it.
On Tue, 15 May 2001, RJ Atkinson wrote:
- That message, "was passed through
ietf_censored(_at_)beatles(_dot_)cselt(_dot_)it"
Therefore, it is kosher :^).
Nope. IETF Censored isn't an IETF list, though an IETF list
is filtered (by someone other than an IETF officer) into that list.
So, why had that "IETF officer" not censored it until
recently?
- Last, how different is that message compared with
the monthly ietf_censored posting?
IETF censored is not an IETF official mailing list.
IETF Censored is a private mailing list operated out of Italy.
Yes, but it is allowed to do a montly posting
to the IETF list?
Forth, we can work it out... we can work out...
Life is very short, and there is no time for fussing
and fighting my friend...
best regards,
--
Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim - VLSM-TJT - http://rms46.vlsm.org
- If ain't broke, ain't fix IT;but I'm broke, so IMFix IT!