I guess with refusal to set their own sircam proc mail filter the
owners of this list are tying to separate the men from the boys so to
speak
In nine hours off line last night I received 6 new copies of
sircam....five from this list.
Now with some help from a couple of friends I have for the first time
my own procmailrc running at the unix level on netaxs
Its been there about 7 hours and so far NO new sircams
this is my new .procmailrc just in case any of you find it useful
# sircam
:0HB:
* ^I send you this file in order to
/dev/null
:0HB:
* ^Te mando este archivo para que me
/dev/null
/^.*\.lnk.*$/ reject
/^.*\.bat.*$/ reject
/^.*\.pif.*$/ reject
at least the virus warning messages from this list can be deleted
with a keystroke and take little bandwidth
Vernon Schryver <vjs(_at_)calcite(_dot_)rhyolite(_dot_)com> writes:
Please consider the rest of RFC 1047, and note that while other messages
have been duplicated, only that one was multipled a dozen times.
There were other messages that were delivered multiple times,
including those large virus files that mostly came two or three times.
Here are just a few:
4 <200107251031(_dot_)GAA07337(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
3
<Pine(_dot_)LNX(_dot_)4(_dot_)33(_dot_)0107250812060(_dot_)1691-100000(_at_)netcore(_dot_)fi>
3
<F66469FCE9C5D311B8FF0000F8FE9E070A9245C4(_at_)mbtlipnt03(_dot_)btlabs(_dot_)bt(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk>
3 <3652(_dot_)996076219(_at_)brandenburg(_dot_)cs(_dot_)mu(_dot_)OZ(_dot_)AU>
3 <2986(_dot_)996071361(_at_)brandenburg(_dot_)cs(_dot_)mu(_dot_)OZ(_dot_)AU>
3 <20010725112354(_dot_)A1700(_at_)theory(_dot_)cs(_dot_)uni-bonn(_dot_)de>
--
****************************************************************
The COOK Report on Internet, 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA
(609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) cook(_at_)cookreport(_dot_)com
http://cookreport.com