April Foolish2001-09-10 09:10:03*> I'm still waiting *> for somebody to tell me that RFC1098 was an even more subtle joke. ;) *> Neat point (as well as a good in-joke). The date field in the RFC index for RFC 1098 is incorrect; we will change it to match RFC 1098 itself, which bears the date "April 1989". RFC Editor
|
|