This is outrageous as it will stop the development of opensource software.
If the W3C needs money, then they should look from their sponsors. I hope
this won't affect IETF, and that Internet Standard won't become closed, open
only to the RICH countries and RICH people (talk about digital divide!). If
W3C goes in this move, then I suggest that IETF bring back the HTML
standards back into the IETF.
Franck Martin
Network and Database Development Officer
SOPAC South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission
Fiji
E-mail: franck(_at_)sopac(_dot_)org <mailto:franck(_at_)sopac(_dot_)org>
Web site: http://www.sopac.org/
<http://www.sopac.org/> Support FMaps: http://fmaps.sourceforge.net/
<http://fmaps.sourceforge.net/>
This e-mail is intended for its addresses only. Do not forward this e-mail
without approval. The views expressed in this e-mail may not be necessarily
the views of SOPAC.
-----Original Message-----
From: Shirley Tseng [mailto:shirleytseng(_at_)earthlink(_dot_)net]
Sent: Monday, 1 October 2001 5:37
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: W3C Fee based Patent Policy - RAND
Hi,
Was this discussed by the IETF or via the IETF/W3C liaison committee? I
didn't see it in the archive. The review period ends today!
A summary at http://www.openphd.net/W3C_Patent_Policy/
W3C Patent Policy
W3C and the Promotion of Fee-based Standards for the Web
last call review period closes on 30 September 2001
Comment archives are at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-patentpolicy-comment/
The Working Draft (http://www.w3.org/TR/patent-policy/) (reproduced in the
Patent Policy Frequently Asked Questions,
http://www.w3.org/2001/08/16-PP-FAQ) also states that RAND allows for
licensing audits (RAND "may include reasonable, customary terms relating to
operation or maintenance of the license relationship such as the following:
audit (when relevant to fees), choice of law, and dispute resolution.")
Shirley Tseng
Infinite Global Infrastructures
www.igillc.com
stseng(_at_)igillc(_dot_)com