Re: [idn] WG last call summary

--On 16. mars 2002 02:21 +0000 "D. J. Bernstein" 
<djb(_at_)cr(_dot_)yp(_dot_)to> wrote:

> There certainly isn't IDN WG consensus on IDNA as the long-term IDN
> solution. In fact, many of us suspect that there's consensus on the
> following statement, which implies that IDNA is merely temporary:
>
>    The long-term IDN solution will encode Unicode characters as UTF-8 on
>    the wire.
If this was reformulated as

 The long-term IDN solution will not use DNS

it would have my vote.