----- Original Message -----
From: "Fred Baker" <fred(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>
To: "Gordon Cook" <cook(_at_)cookreport(_dot_)com>
Cc: <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 8:28 PM
Subject: Re: ICANN, .org & " a total lack of technical due diligence"
At 02:33 PM 8/30/2002 -0400, Gordon Cook wrote:
ICANN's YOUR organization Vint.
is there any chance that you could take this discussion of an organization
that the IETF doesn't report to, answers questions for (as it does for
anyone else) when asked, and tries very hard to otherwise say nothing in
particular about, to some list that has something to do with said other
organization?
sheesh...
http://www.isoc.org/
a.. New! ICANN staff preliminary recommendation: ISOC to manage .ORG. This
preliminary report follows an extensive bidding and
evaluation process.
....
a.. Cisco Fellow Fred Baker to Chair ISOC's Board of Trustees
====================================================================
Who owns IN-ADDR.ORG ?
What plans are there for 128-bit DNS services for .ORG owners ?
Does the ISOC have a license for 128-bit DNS technology ?
Will .ORG be used to test the new 128-bit DNS alias mapping features with .ORGY
?
How many servers are planned in each of the 32-bit DNS .ORG Mirrored Registries
?
...when will those servers be available and how do you plan to test
soft-failover arrangements ?
...will there be a .ORG test laboratory with TWO complete collections of
servers to model what
is out in the field....BEFORE....going live ?
Jim Fleming
2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB:...IPv8 is closer than you think...
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
0:190 ORG [ORGY]