to add to this:
does the following mentioned in the draft....seem to make sense to anyone
placing an ISD call somewhere:::
International Segment (IS):
To be coded according to ITU-T recommendation T.50. The
International Segment (IS) field provides a 3 character ISO
3166 Geographic/Political Country Code. The country code is
based on the three-character uppercase alphabetic ISO 3166
Country Code (e.g., USA, FRA)..
The National Segment (NS) field consists of two sub-fields: the
ITU Carrier Code followed by a Unique Access Point Code. The
ITU Carrier Code is a code assigned to a network
operator/service provider, maintained by the ITU-T
Telecommunication Service Bureau in association with
Recommendation M.1400. This code shall consist of 1-6 left-
justified characters, alphabetic, or leading alphabetic with
trailing numeric. The unique access point code is a matter for
the organization to which the country code and ITU carrier code
have been assigned, provided that uniqueness is guaranteed.
This code shall consist of 6-11 characters, with trailing NULL,
completing the 12-character National Segment
are these parameters to be ignored? is ietf planning to redefine these
parameters? and their values?
to the writers:
why is all this being mentioned under an "ASON" draft?? why not under a
signalling draft?
and the TLV and point 3 below still holds...
----- Original Message -----
From: Bruce <bruce_reid202(_at_)hotmail(_dot_)com>
To: <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:05 AM
Subject: queries:draft-aboulmagd-ccamp-crldp-ason-ext-02.txt
hello,
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-aboulmagd-ccamp-crldp-ason-ext-02.
txt
what is:
1: defination of a call (SIP WG exists in ietf, but this query is specific
to a "PCM" person's area.......)
2: if its a generalised protocol limited to TLV based specs, why is it
limited to CRLDP?
3. elaborating point 2, if one doesnt have a standard for signalling
protocol as of date, how does the signalling protocol even matter to the
this draft except for conflicts in number space...why cant one realise the
basic algorithm proposed in the draft
-B