See inline comments
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 17:34:46 +0700, Gary Feldman <gfyho(_at_)YAHOO(_dot_)COM>
wrote: [snip]
Also, is there any reason to introduce new language instead of using
existing language? ISP is already accepted for Internet Service
Provider;
SP isn't
I want to encompass both webhosting firm and ISP. I agree it is
clumsy to introduce a new acronym. Please offer a suggestion here.
The term "abuse" is already well-known to describe the
entire class of problems; calling it "pollution" is at best an annoying
distraction.
Here I have a particular psychological point in mind. I want to
build on the success in suppressing physical pollution, by moving
to the "polluter pays" principle from the present "victim pays".
If I use "polluter" the audience may more easily make the mental
connection.
Jeffrey Race