Re: Registration silliness

ietf

2003-03-11 18:45:52


On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 05:39  PM, Spencer Dawkins wrote:

So I'm wondering why, if we're all individuals at the IETF,
"Company" is a required field on the registration form?

I've always assumed it was a coding error. Still, it should have beenfixed long ago.

In the past when I've travelled to IETFs without employer support, I'vebeen able to use a single space to satisfy the sanity check.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Registration silliness, Spencer Dawkins Re: Registration silliness, Keith Moore <= .p7s attachment, Michael Re: .p7s attachment, Lars Eggert Re: .p7s attachment, Michael Re: Registration silliness, Donald Eastlake 3rd Re: Registration silliness, Scott W Brim Re: Registration silliness, Spencer Dawkins

Previous by Date:	Re: "IETF consensus" in IANA considerations [was Re: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to Informational ], Keith Moore
Next by Date:	Re: Registration silliness, Donald Eastlake 3rd
Previous by Thread:	Registration silliness, Spencer Dawkins
Next by Thread:	.p7s attachment, Michael
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]