-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
"Dan" == Dan Kolis <dank(_at_)hq(_dot_)lindsayelec(_dot_)com> writes:
>> On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:35:42 EDT,
dank(_at_)hq(_dot_)lindsayelec(_dot_)com (Dan Kolis) said:
>>> Valdis(_dot_)Kletnieks(_at_)vt(_dot_)edu wrote:
>>> >"...IPv6 over telepathy"
>>> Dan says:
>>> Wow! I had that idea yesterday; (It's almost like you where reading
>>> my mind)
>> !!!
>> The draft for IPv6 over telepathy strongly recommends the use of IPSEC
>> in multi-hop configurations, for all the obvious data-interception and
>> data-injection
>> reasons.....
Dan> Also useful for all TCP/IP; (Telepathy Control Protocol /
Dan> Intra-Polergeist)
Dan> messaging. Not required for UDP (Uber Daemon Protocol) though.
Most IPsec uses ESP (Extra Sensory Perception) to transfer data "securely",
with the actual packet being just spare garbage that is transmitted to make
it not too obvious that we are violating causality.
It isn't clear that if you have TCP (as described above) that actually need
more security than that - since you can avoid even transmitting the data.
] At IETF57 in Wien, Austria | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ottawa(_dot_)on(_dot_)ca
http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] printk("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy");[
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys
iQCVAwUBPxPIP4qHRg3pndX9AQH6hgP7BXT1yK+1hxJyfa4+0RNzm4o2ZHBbTJlg
hxk6XfBRuDtCw7JB5PpogD62+xRwmbTt+1CIPMhChhOUBCS/L0BhOvsqy0/dvlCj
IzhkDAwRihJlqbqk7KPawaYIE7hTjoDYuW1TFSft61Z1o2hjr2j9ulKejzbrh0FH
giqcooekcus=
=pAI9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----