Re: rfc1918 impact

ietf

Re: rfc1918 impact

2003-10-15 15:49:47

Keith will not like it, but NAT vendors will take suggestions that
will make NAT better.


I'd be happy for them to take suggestions from me, or IETF.  But there's
a big difference between saying "if you must do NAT, please do it this
way" and "NATs are good if they are implemented this way"

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: rfc1918 impact, Michel Py Re: rfc1918 impact, Iljitsch van Beijnum Message not available RE: rfc1918 impact, Daniel Senie Re: rfc1918 impact, Keith Moore <= RE: rfc1918 impact, Michel Py Re: rfc1918 impact, Keith Moore RE: rfc1918 impact, Michel Py

Previous by Date:	RE: rfc1918 impact, Daniel Senie
Next by Date:	RE: rfc1918 impact, Michel Py
Previous by Thread:	RE: rfc1918 impact, Daniel Senie
Next by Thread:	RE: rfc1918 impact, Michel Py
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]