Hmmm,
What is wrong with ISOC?
Cannot it be this body, we are looking for?
Cheers
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 11:36, vinton g. cerf wrote:
There have been fairly intense discussions in a series of meetings called
"PrepComs" as in "preparatory committees" leading up to the World Summit on
the Information Society (WSIS) taking place December 10-12 in Geneva. In the
most recent meetings, a "government only" rule was invoked that excluded
interested parties such as ICANN, among others, but the texts have been made
visible. Of course, it remains to be seen whether these texts will be adopted
by the summit meeting representatives.
The texts cover principles and action plans, respectively, for "realization"
of the Information Society.
The subject of "Internet Governance" has been a large focus of attention, as
has been a proposal for creating an international fund to promote the
creation of information infrastructure in the developing world. Internet
Governance is a very broad topic including law enforcement, intellectual
property protection, consumer protection, tax policies, and so on. It also
happens to include some of the things that ICANN is responsible for.
Unfortunately, the discussion has tended to center on ICANN as the only
really visible example of an organization attempting to develop policy (which
is being treated as synonymous with "governance"). ICANN's mandate is very
limited and it would be helpful if the broad governance issues mentioned
above could find other organizational homes. ICANN's work could be fitted
into a larger framework but some people seem to think that if ICANN doesn't
do all the things that might fall into "Internet governance" then ICANN
should be replaced with, eg, an
!
ITU or
UN body.
----
Franck Martin
franck(_at_)sopac(_dot_)org
SOPAC, Fiji
GPG Key fingerprint = 44A4 8AE4 392A 3B92 FDF9 D9C6 BE79 9E60 81D9 1320
"Toute connaissance est une reponse a une question" G.Bachelard