I tottally support the criterias used by Spamassassin even if they are
RFC compliants...
We need some tools to help us clean the SPAM. Yes there are some false
positives, but I have less of them than SPAM...
I clean most of my mailbox by looking a the SPAM header, without having
to read all that junk...
I think we will argue here on how we can fight SPAM and how can IETF
help it... There are tools out there, but this is not a perfect
science...
Cheers
On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 08:01, Keith Moore wrote:
I just saw a message that was forwarded to the ipv6(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org list
by
spamassassin.
Apparently spamassassin decided it was spam but forwarded to the list
anyway with explanation of why it thought it was spam. Not only was
the message legitimate (it was an I-D announcement) but it reveals just
how bogus the criteria used by spamassassin were:
Please consider this a formal objection to this practice. Even if
spamassassin is being configured to forward the messages, it's doing so
in such a way as to make the actual message very difficult to read.
----
Franck Martin
franck(_at_)sopac(_dot_)org
SOPAC, Fiji
GPG Key fingerprint = 44A4 8AE4 392A 3B92 FDF9 D9C6 BE79 9E60 81D9 1320
"Toute connaissance est une reponse a une question" G.Bachelard