might be better as:
In no way should this experiment or any future BCP for this small
number of cases take precendence over the IETF's normal mode of
operation. Specifically, these procedures are only to be
used when a working group agrees to use them.
Define "agrees". When a WG is blocked on consensus for a technical
issue, and someone proposes using the alternative process to reach a
decision, do you need consensus to use the alternative process? If so,
I'm skeptical that people who have been stonewalling each other on the
technical decision are going to agree to a process that means they don't
get to stonewall any more.
the ID does go into a process to try to deal with this
Scott
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf