Hi Patrice,
At 11:07 AM -0400 10/20/04, Patrice Lyons wrote:
You mentioned the importance of keeping support services, such as management
of cash flow, separate from IETF technical efforts. I share this concern in
large part. However, I would draw a distinction between carrying out
routine administrative, financial (like accounting for expenses and meeting
fees), technical (such as computer rooms at meetings), legal or other
support services for the IETF ("support services"), and the solicitation,
donation, receipt and other fundraising efforts for IETF purposes
("fundraising").
I don't believe that this distinction is as clean as you have
indicated, particularly when it comes to meeting sponsorship,
donations-in-kind and preferred contract pricing.
Meeting sponsorship is one means by which large companies can offer
financial support to the IETF (in return for PR and good will), so it
is not really distinct from fund raising. This lack-of-distinction
is emphasized by the meeting in Korea, where the sponsors donated
$150,000 to the CNRI/Foretec, in addition to usual sponsorship costs
which run in 6 figures themselves. I have no objection, at all, to
having our meetings sponsored and/or having the sponsors make
additional donations, but I think that meeting sponsorship is quite
clearly a form of funding.
Another form of funding is donations-in-kind. CNRI/Foretec currently
buys equipment, software, etc. for running the IETF adminstrative
activity. It might be possible to get companies to donate these
goods, so that we don't have to pay for them. But, this is also a
form of funding.
Another, even more subtle form of funding is preferred contract
pricing. Carl Malamud's report supposes that there are some people
who would offer preferred (or zero-cost) prices to the IETF for their
services, either for the PR or good will associated with providing
those services. We already see this today on a smaller level -- the
ops.ietf.org site is on Randy Bush's server, edu.ietf.org is on James
Seng's and tools.ietf.org is on Henrik Levkowetz's. Many people
donate their time to do a number of system administration tasks for
the IETF and/or to run servers for our use (issue tracking, jabber,
etc.) Maybe someone else will agree to run the IETF mailing lists for
free (or cheap)? Or our web site? These are also all donations of
goods, services, etc.
So, I propose that we can't realistically separate all fund raising
activities from the administrative support activity, at least not
without eliminating some significant sources of funding.
Please let me know if this clarification of my comments meets your concerns.
I look forward to resolving the administrative issues that have been under
discussion recently, but would add a note of caution on a rush to judgment.
The reorganization issues under consideration are of major importance for
the future of the IETF, and the Internet community more generally.
We are in agreement that decisions about the structure of the IETF
are important, long-term decisions that should not be taken lightly
or made hastily.
Margaret
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf