Scott,
I think that my main point was not clear enough - the current
wording implies that ISOC folk (accountant, President/CEO, lawyer,
etc - but not BoT) are not permitted be part of the RFP response review
process and are not primitted to warn the IAD and IAOC that the contractor
they want to sign up has a bad track record or that the proposed
contract itself has a significant legal flaw - this seems basically
broken to me
Just a reminder that the current BCP draft has the ISOC President/CEO
as a voting member of the IAOC, so it seems unlikely that this
officer is excluded from the RFP response review process.
As to the accountant and lawyer (I'd look out for too many etcetera's :) -
again, considering that the IAOC is intended to be part of ISOC, I wonder
in what model the audit and legal reviews that are part of the RFP
response reviews will not be ISOC audit and legal reviews, using ISOC
accountant/lawyer?
Allison
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf