ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Consensus? Variance

2004-12-06 18:35:39
Done

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org 
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org]On Behalf Of
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 10:20
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Consensus? Variance


After reviewing the discussion on this topic, I think the 
rough consensus 
is conformant with this suggestion:

- Remove the 2nd ("Disclaimer:") paragraph from section 5

- Insert the following as part of section 3 (I suggest just 
before section 
3.1):

  If the IASA is unable to comply with the procedures 
described in this
  document for legal, accounting or practical reasons, the 
IAOC shall report
  that fact to the community, along with the variant 
procedure it intends to
  follow. If the problem is a long-term one, the IAOC shall 
ask the IETF
  to update this document to reflect the changed procedure.

(Comparision to previouis suggestion: I changed "here" to "in this 
document" to make sure it covers the whole BCP, not just the 
section it 
appears in. I also changed IAOC to IASA in the third word - 
if the IAD is 
unable to comply with procedures, IAOC is responsible for 
reporting that to 
the community, too.)

(Note: A deviation from procedures without appropriate 
justification is 
certainly an action of the IAOC that can be appealed. See 
next message.)

OK?

                      Harald


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>