Done
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org]On Behalf Of
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 10:20
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Consensus? Variance
After reviewing the discussion on this topic, I think the
rough consensus
is conformant with this suggestion:
- Remove the 2nd ("Disclaimer:") paragraph from section 5
- Insert the following as part of section 3 (I suggest just
before section
3.1):
If the IASA is unable to comply with the procedures
described in this
document for legal, accounting or practical reasons, the
IAOC shall report
that fact to the community, along with the variant
procedure it intends to
follow. If the problem is a long-term one, the IAOC shall
ask the IETF
to update this document to reflect the changed procedure.
(Comparision to previouis suggestion: I changed "here" to "in this
document" to make sure it covers the whole BCP, not just the
section it
appears in. I also changed IAOC to IASA in the third word -
if the IAD is
unable to comply with procedures, IAOC is responsible for
reporting that to
the community, too.)
(Note: A deviation from procedures without appropriate
justification is
certainly an action of the IAOC that can be appealed. See
next message.)
OK?
Harald
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf