See: https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=751
The text suggested by Scott would mean to change:
Removability: While there is no current plan to transfer the legal
and financial home of the IASA to another corporation, the IASA
shall be structured to enable a clean transition in the event that
the IETF community decides, through BCP publication, that such a
transition is required.
into:
Removability: While there is no current plan to transfer the legal
and financial home of the IASA to another corporation, the IASA
shall be structured to enable a clean transition in the event that
the IETF community decides, through the publication of a
procedure document where a formal assertion of IETF consensus
is required (currently called BCP), that such a
transition is required.
I find that latter sentence harder to read, but I can live with it.
I saw Scott (as only one) in favor of the change, while at least 2 people
(Harald and Sam) objected. Not clear what I should do.
Unless instructed otherwise, I will leave the text alone.
Bert
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org]On Behalf Of
sob(_at_)harvard(_dot_)edu
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 14:28
To: harald(_at_)alvestrand(_dot_)no; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org;
sob(_at_)harvard(_dot_)edu
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-iasa-bcp-02: section 7 - Removability - BCP
Harald sez:
We don't have a better formal term at the moment for
"procedure document
where formal assertion of IETF consensus is required".
why not just say that?
Removability: While there is no current plan to transfer the legal
and financial home of the IASA to another corporation, the IASA
shall be structured to enable a clean transition in the
event that
the IETF community decides, through the publication of a
procedure document where a formal assertion of IETF consensus
is required. (currently called BCP) ...
Scott
---
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 06:39:37 +0100
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald(_at_)alvestrand(_dot_)no>
To: Scott Bradner <sob(_at_)harvard(_dot_)edu>, ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-iasa-bcp-02: section 7 - Removability - BCP
--On 12. desember 2004 21:08 -0500 Scott Bradner
<sob(_at_)harvard(_dot_)edu> wrote:
open from last version
I'd change "BCP publication" to "using its normal
consensus processes"
(BCP is no magic term and may not survive the newtrk process)
I did not see anyone speak up to support the use of the term "BCP"
yet the term (the meaning of which may change in the
future) is still
used
I support it.
We don't have a better formal term at the moment for
"procedure document
where formal assertion of IETF consensus is required".
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf