OK, the issue tracker says that we have "accepted text".
It is not the text that I prefer. Not many people have
reacted to the discussion. So I am not sure.
The proposed text by Margaret I believe is as follows:
change:
5.4 Other ISOC Support
Other ISOC support shall be based on the budget process as specified
in Section 6. ISOC shall credit the appropriate IASA accounts at
least quarterly.
into
5.4 Other ISOC Support
Other ISOC support shall be based on the budget process as specified
in Section 6. ISOC will credit additional funds to the IASA accounts,
as necessary to cover the approved budget.
If I read the discussion correctly, then Scott and Brian say: wfm.
It misses however the "periodical" that Brian seemed to like and that
also Harald expressed support for. I know that I prefer to keep the
periodic as well. Scott was very opposed to the quarterly, but he did
seem to accept "at least 3 times a year".
So how about this possible text:
5.4 Other ISOC Support
Other ISOC support shall be based on the budget process as specified
in Section 6. ISOC will periodically credit additional funds to the
IASA accounts to cover anticipated expenditures for that period
within the yearly budget.
Bert
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org]On Behalf Of
Brian E Carpenter
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 14:24
To: Scott Bradner
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-iasa-bcp-02: section 5.4 - oher ISOC support
Scott Bradner wrote:
Margaret suggests:
Instead of specifying a number of "payments" per year perhaps we
could say something like: "ISOC will credit additional
funds to the
IASA accounts, as necessary to cover the approved budget."?
Elsewhere it says that meeting fees and designated
donations will be
credited to the IASA account when they are received, so it seem as
though these additional "payments" (credits?) would only be
necessary if the IASA budget for the given period has not been
covered by meeting fees and designated donations. Right?
works for me
I can live with this
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf