At 03:11 04/01/2005, Addison Phillips [wM] wrote:
I'm not going to respond to most of Jefsey's comments. However, wearing my
W3C hat for a moment....*
Thank you for that.
To the extent that W3C specifications are important consumers of language
tags, there is interest at W3C and I'm sure the W3C's official liasons
will make the W3C's position (assuming that it has one) known at an
appropriate time.
??? I am not sure I understand. Every network user application is a
consumers of language support. If there is no W3C official position yet,
why not to follow under IAB guidance (or to review) the charter I proposed
yesterday, in an IETF way everyone could participate, and to have all these
applications supported one shot in working on a linguistic ontology where
each language instance would be documented by an ad hoc authoritative
source. Otherwise it could not be the standard you wish.
jfc
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf