ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 169.254/16

2005-01-15 16:37:09
In message 
<7171(_dot_)1105829321(_at_)marajade(_dot_)sandelman(_dot_)ottawa(_dot_)on(_dot_)ca>,
 "Michael Richards
on" writes:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


Is there a document that explains how 169.254/16 is used?
And if so, how come RFC3330 does not reference it?


draft-ietf-zeroconf-ipv4-linklocal-17.txt, currently in the RFC 
editor's queue.  That, of course, explains why 3330 doesn't have the 
citation -- it's not an RFC.  (Arguably, 3330 should have cited the 
I-D.)

                --Prof. Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • 169.254/16, Michael Richardson
    • Re: 169.254/16, Steven M. Bellovin <=